The Pennsylvania Progressive
...all rights reserved...

(HOME)


[mobile]

Contributors
John Morgan
Blog Owner, Editor, Publisher

PA Eagle Eye
Contributing Writer
Walter Brasch
Contributing Writer
Jamoca
Contributing Writer
Great Auk
Site Administrator

About
Contact: PAprogressive(at)Gmail(dot)com

Search




Advanced Search


Progressive Allies
Common Sense 2
Act Blue
DaylInsights
Beaver County Blue
Democracy For America
Pennsylvania For Democracy
The Nation
Progressive Democrats of America
Truthout
OpEd News
Misled Into War: A Timeline
BuzzFlash
Lefty Blogs
The Advocate
Democracy For Berks
Kutztown Area Democratic Club
Pennsylvania Diversity Network
Upper Bucks For Democracy
People For the American Way
The Raw Story
Tredyffrin Township Democrats
Public Citizen
CREW
The New PA 16th
Progressives For Pennsylvania
Casino Free Philadelphia
Air America Radio
Progressive Majority
Democratic Talk Radio
AlterNet
Dems '08
Equality Forum
Human Rights Campaign
Equality Advocates
Green Party of PA
Americans Against Escalation In Iraq
Northern Chester County Dems
Eastern PA PFLAG

News and Resources
WGPA Radio
The Accountability Project
Politics PA
The Real Sam Rohrer
BBC News
PennLive News Flash
National Public Radio
Federal Election Commission
Fact Check.org
Open Secrets
Coalition For Voting Integrity
PA Commissions, Elections, Legislation
Project Vote Smart
Iraq On The Record
The Cook Political Report
Neighborhood Networks
Public Radio Capitol News
Money Line
Fair Trade
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The Philadelphia Inquirer
CNN
MSNBC
Harrisburg Patriot News

The Pennsylvania Progressive

Sestak Seeks to Undo Citizens United Decision

by: John Morgan

Fri Feb 05, 2010 at 13:59:50 PM EST


Congressman Joe Sestak introduced legislation to day which would unravel the recent shocking Supreme Court decision in Citizens United.  Saying "I thoroughly disagreed with the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision because it gives the same status to corporations as to individual citizens in society by removing decades-old precedents that protected the electoral process from the influence of money. Corporations are not equal members of society as an individual citizen, and I agree with Justice Stevens, who authored the case's dissent, that the ruling could undermine the integrity of our Nation's elected institutions."

The Sestak bill would impose the following restrictions:

It would require annual voting by shareholders of a corporation if:

   * The total campaign spending for the year would be over $8,000 for companies with under 100 employees.
   * The total campaign spending for the year would be over $20,000 for companies with over 100 employees.

The bill also requires that if a corporation makes such a disbursement without shareholder approval, each responsible officer and director of the corporation will be personally liable for the amount of the unauthorized expenditure.

John Morgan :: Sestak Seeks to Undo Citizens United Decision
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Sestak seeks to undue court decision (0.00 / 0)
I wonder if Sestak could introduce something similar for the unions which contribute money of their members to candidates that they don't endorse.  There should be the same rule applied to unions that apply to corporations.

The unions will never (0.00 / 0)
have the same amount of money as corporations.  It isn't unions undermining democracy but corporations.  We need more union involvement, not less.

Follow me on Twitter:  JohnPMorgan

[ Parent ]
campaign contributions (0.00 / 0)
John, you said: "The unions will never have the same amount of money as corporations.  It isn't unions undermining democracy but corporations.  We need more union involvement, not less."

You are very mis-informed.  In the 2008 election cycle, the Pennsylvania State Education Association contributed over 2 MILLION dollars to political campaigns.  The PA Trial Lawyers Association contributed almost 2 MILLION as well.  

If YOU don't want to undermine democracy, then you must apply the rules consistently and equally to all special interest groups.  As a teacher, I wish I had an opportunity to vote for where my money was going, just as  Sestak wants to do for the shareholders of coorporations.

The difference between corporations and unions?  Most corporations provide products or services that benefit society; unions only advocate for a particular group of people without producing anything; they are often counterproductive, in the long run working against those they are supposed to protect and serve as well as the public interest.


[ Parent ]
LOL, you think unions (0.00 / 0)
spent a smuch money as corporate America?

Earth to cecilcitizen!

Follow me on Twitter:  JohnPMorgan


[ Parent ]
Here's proof (0.00 / 0)
Open Secrets has done a study from 2007-2008.  Business contributions totaled $1,964,870, 224 versus union contributions of $74,773,481.  Read it and weep.  

Follow me on Twitter:  JohnPMorgan

[ Parent ]
Supreme Court Ruling (0.00 / 0)
Since the Supreme Court made the ruling is this not now SETTLED LAW?  Why would a legislator seek to undue a ruling by the Court which is settled law?
As a member of a union, the members are never asked who they want the union to support.  That is not democratic involvement.  The elitist at the top (union) decide where the money goes!  These same union leaders have probably never done a hard days work in their lives.  They collect their money off the sweat of the workers who at times are forced to give them money (union dues).

That isn't what "settled law" means n/t (0.00 / 0)


Follow me on Twitter:  JohnPMorgan

[ Parent ]
Dancer: No, it's not settled law. (0.00 / 0)
Settled law is a decision made by the Supreme Court (or a lower court undisturbed by a higher court) which is not changed for a long period of time and typically cited as precedent by courts in other cases over the years. Much too soon to consider Citizens United as settled law. In fact, it is close to the opposite for three reasons.

First, it is fresh off the presses and has not been tested by time or other decisions. Second, it reversed decades of what some legal scholars thought was settled law to the contrary. Third, it was a 5 to 4 decision and remains subject to reversal by the Supreme Court with a single membership change on the court. If anything, it is unsettled law.

Above all, our constitution, which provides for checks and balances, allows Congress to pass legislation reversing the effect of Supreme Court decisions which do not affect constitutional rights. The latter still can be reversed, but a constitutional amendment is required.  


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Pennsylvania Blogs
ACLU PA
PA 2010
Drexel Dems
Kill Gerrymandering In PA
2 Political Junkies
A Big Fat Slob
A Smoke Filled Room
Above Average Jane
Beer Leaguer
A Lehigh Valley POV
Gort42
Carbon County Democrats For Change
PA Labor Movement
PA Dems
Declarations of Pride
Diondega 412
Erie Gay News
Erie Pressible
Fact-esque
Froth Slosh B'Gosh
Future Majority
Green Dog Dem
Jesse White
Keystone Politics
Left Of Centre
Lehigh Valley Ramblings
Pennsylvania Independent
Mark Rauterkus & Running Mates
MainLine Peace Action
Making Sense With Don L
Metroblogging Philadelphia
Montco DFA
NEPArtisan
Harrisburg Politics
Philly Future
Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents
Progress Pittsburgh
PSoTD
Suburban Guerrilla
Thomas C Waters
The Liberal Doomsayer
Young Philly Politics
The Lehigh Valley Political Blog
All Spin Zone
PA WaterCooler
Truth, Justice & Peace
Wilkes-Barre Online

State Blogs
The Albany Project
Article XI
AZNetroots
Bleeding Heartland
Blogging For Michigan
Blue Commonwealth
Blue Hampshire
Burnt Orange Report
Buckeye State Blog
Calitics
Prairie State Blue
Square State
My Left Nutmeg
Florida Politics
Forward Kansas
Free State Politics
Hillbilly Report
Blue Indiana
Indigo Journal
Left In Alabama
Left In The West
Loaded Orygun
Turn Maine Blue
Blue Mass Group
Michigan Liberal
Nebraska Netroots
Minnesota Progressive Project
New Dominion Project
New Nebraska
Blue Jersey
Blue Oklahoma
Show me Progress
Green Mountain Daily
West Virginia Blue
Blog Roll
AmericaBlog
Attytood
Bad Attitudes
Border Jumpers
Inlandz
Bloggernista
Booman Tribune
Bootstrapping Andrew Sullivan
Brainshrub
Caffection
Crooks and Liars
Culture Kitchen
Daily Kos
Deer Jane
Delaware Liberal
Down With Tyranny
Firedoglake
Group News Blog
Hullabaloo (Digby)
Feministe
GovernMentality
Kid Oakland
Marisacat
Media Matters
Politics of Mesothelioma
Mid Atlantic Labor Blog
My Left Wing
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Nourishing the Planet
Orcinus
Organized For Once
Open Records
Pandagon
Pam's House Blend
Politico's Ben Smith
Planned Parenthood Action Fund
Queah's Blog
Rubber Hose
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Terrorism News
The Brad Blog
The Gist
The Bilerico Project
The Huffington Post
The Jaundiced Eye
The Quaker Agitator
Think Progress
Iraq Today
Informed Consent
WIMN

Powered by: SoapBlox